Of all the annoying phrases favoured by people  who have spent too much time in or around business schools, I think brand  ambassador has to be among the worst. Each time I hear it, I cringe  and look for an exit.  Sometimes I feel my blood pressure climb, or  find myself breaking out in something like prickly heat.  
With a few  exceptions, which we’ll come to later, this term is simply another name  for a someone (usually, but not always a celebrity) who’s getting paid to endorse a brand. 
For a long time, I  wasn’t sure exactly why this phrase had such a strong affect on me.   After all,  the concept isn’t new.  Before we had brand ambassadors, we just used  other words to describe people who were paid to sell products:  endorsers, hawkers, touts, pushers, salespeople… even sell outs!  None  of those terms gave me a rash!  Does Kareena Kapoor love that bottle  of Pepsi as much as it appears she does?  Is Aamir Khan truly devoted to  Tata Sky and Coca Cola?  Who knows—but more importantly, who really cares? Not I, though plenty of people must, or we wouldn't see so much of them!
I think what I find so annoying is the way in which modern capitalism seems to be taking itself more and  more seriously.  Companies no longer stoop so low as to advertise their brands,  but rather they engage in diplomatic relations with the “modern,  sophisticated consumer.”  (And they expect newspapers to  cover this diplomacy as if it were news—but that’s a story for another  day.) 
So I hate the term brand  ambassador in part because it’s just so silly and  self-important-sounding.  Still, what companies  do to sell their products is really up to them.  Let the buyer beware,  after all.  But it makes  no sense at all for  organizations like the World Wildlife Fund, to adopt this term, as they did in their recent Earth Hour Campaign. When I hear about this happening, I not only get a rash,but I begin mumbling mean things under my  breath, and I often don't stop until Mrs. Batti or one of my children tell me to be quiet!
Let me be clear: I do not object to celebrities  who support good causes—one has to assume they do it for free, and  who knows, they may well make a difference.  Of course,  we have to be careful not to put  too much faith in the power these endorsements. It's great, I suppose, that  Abhishek Bachchan endorses Earth Hour.  But given the fact that he, as much as any film hero, stands for conspicuous consumption (and the well known fact that he will endorse nearly anything--from blue jeans to high tech gadgets to automobiles) how much can his word mean in this context? In any case, the  backbone of any effective organization has to be the activists and  leaders who do the day-to-day organizing on the ground.  These are the  real real heroes, and we should never forget that.  
But leaving aside celebrity endorsements, I just don't like it when people and organizations that stand for environmental or social  justice adopt the language of corporations.  We should never say words like brand ambassador without throwing in a heavy dose of irony (as Greenpeace does, here).   Why?  Simple: we are not businesses, and we should allow no  confusion about that point.  Our goal is change, not profit.  Yes, many  good organizations need money to be effective.  And some good  businesses aim to profit responsibly by doing sustainable things.  That's great.  But at the end  of the day, the hearts and minds of the people we need to reach are not  for sale.  Hearts and minds rarely are, and anyway if we fight on that  ground, we are bound to lose, since we will never have as much money as  the corporations that profit from over consumption and exploitation.
Likewise, our job is not  to “sell a brand”—it’s to conceive, consider, and communicate  ideas—and to challenge the power of the people  who stand against the earth and the right of all people to live  sustainably on it..  For that, we need activists,  spokespeople, and leaders; we do not need—will never need—salespeople,  touts, hawkers, sell outs or brand ambassadors!
 ***
Is there a word or phrase you can't stand? Why not comment? You'll get no money or fame around here, but it might be fun! 


 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 



team-building. i hate the phrase team-building. especially when it comes along with an office trip to a Gurgaon "resort" and involves team-building games.
ReplyDelete@janice--i'm so glad someone other than me feels that way about "team-building". Teams and teamwork are for sports. "Cooperation," on the other hand, is always a good thing!
ReplyDeleteDid I mention I have learned hate the term, "World Class City?"
It's nice to know that I am not alone in my contempt for the term "brand ambassador". In my current quest for employment, I constantly find myself cringing at ads seeking"brand ambassadors" and "marketing superstars".
ReplyDelete